Appendix to the Journals of the Senate and Assembly of the ..session of the Legislature of the State of California . sselfrom Port Costa. The complaint was taken up with tbe Southern Pacific Company, who made asatisfactory adjustment by publishing from Mococo the same rates as were iueffect from Port Costa. Freight—Glass C. 2083. September 23, 1913. Illinois-Pacific Company. San Francisco, referred to the Commission papersin a claim against the Western Pacific Railway Company involving charges assessed 376 RElOHT OF CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMMISSION. HKsinst a carload of bottlos
Appendix to the Journals of the Senate and Assembly of the ..session of the Legislature of the State of California . sselfrom Port Costa. The complaint was taken up with tbe Southern Pacific Company, who made asatisfactory adjustment by publishing from Mococo the same rates as were iueffect from Port Costa. Freight—Glass C. 2083. September 23, 1913. Illinois-Pacific Company. San Francisco, referred to the Commission papersin a claim against the Western Pacific Railway Company involving charges assessed 376 RElOHT OF CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMMISSION. HKsinst a carload of bottlos forwarded San Francisco to Oroville. via the WesternPacific to Marysville. tlience to destination via the Southern Pacific, (.laim wasl>ased on the applii-nlion of the rate whicli woiiM have applied had the consignmentmoved <lin<-t from San Francisco to Oroville via the Southern racific. The consi(;nm<nt moved in confurmily with the hill of hidinj;, and therefore therewere no KTountls upon which the Commission could authorize the application f rai •via the direct route of tiie Southern Cars for Wood. I. C. 2090. September 24. 1913. McParley & Smith Mircantilo Company, Cottonwood, wired the Commissitm stating that they were unable to secure cars for the loading of wood. The coni- lilaint was taken up with the general manager of the Southern Pacific Cumpiiny who arranged to provide proper equipment. Detention of C. 2091. September ;. l.»i:?. fJustav A. Rehrnd, Midlake, wrote the advising that he was unableto .secure delivery of a sliiiinieiit of household goixls forwarded from San . toCkinh. ;.tigation developed the fact that the consignment was forwanledshippers order, and therefore could not be delivered by the trnnsportation companywithout surrender of the original bill of lading; the bill of lading had been lost,and the Commission arranged to have the goods delivered upon filing of projier bon<l. FREicn
Size: 3385px × 739px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorcaliforn, bookcentury1800, bookdecade1850, bookyear1853
