. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . was not t^ At tliat time - -0. Tlie water vould n -t flo^^ A. That that you fire speaking?; of viould not a,>r), If there ts&& aiiy connection betvveen there it niust behuBod on the supposition th^it on the de th that viell istliere is a etill freer f^ravel, or whatever the materialthere is, throwdi that well, than there is near the eur-f«ioe, and tiiat the waters at the OUcar&onf^a Sprin/^s at thatpoin
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . was not t^ At tliat time - -0. Tlie water vould n -t flo^^ A. That that you fire speaking?; of viould not a,>r), If there ts&& aiiy connection betvveen there it niust behuBod on the supposition th^it on the de th that viell istliere is a etill freer f^ravel, or whatever the materialthere is, throwdi that well, than there is near the eur-f«ioe, and tiiat the waters at the OUcar&onf^a Sprin/^s at thatpoint, are ^lein^o;; drawn into it four or five hunr^rod feetunder the fTound, and not on a ^ from the OnciPionganprinj[;8 to the tunnel floor, w^dch ie on a 58 foot grade?that is 80, iant it? A, Well, to tho floor of the tunnel I should say beinr thelesser j^ade, the if^atcT would ^-o southeast rather Uieoi tothe floor of the tunnel in tb^t locrjiity,0. It would do that even if Uie raateriul vere ©qutdly freeto the flow of water* j\. The ruitcie natc;rial that is northweetv rly of that lowtiT 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 O = 14 - w 1516 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 lii 0, If you imderBtfxnd no I want now to have your o])i^»ion asari export uhetlicr the introcfuction of thiB f-oct that thofloor of Uuit tuftnt;! is 6b foct feot lower than uoine (lointon that Stream, is not ti, more sham or falsequfmtity, and »»oulri havo nothing; whatever to flo sith theflow of the vat or in t-hat riroction? A. Woli, I would wiiJit to know junt exi^ctly in v^iat respectond it wtis introduced for; I have not introducedthe difference in i;levation .^r/self ajir coni^equf^^tly -0. ¥ Cousin?^ was calleid upon, apparently in all eer-iouBness, to testify that this point on the Cuctir-ionf!;aP>tronJTj, on the eafit eiidre of the hillsi was /£ fett hirhertlvrn the floor of the tunnel at well No. 4 or I dont knor vhat docution he miijAt from it. Because
Size: 1288px × 1941px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
