The apple as affected by varying degrees of dormant and seasonal pruning . Fig. 17.—Arkansas Tree Before Pruning at the Beginning of the Fig. 18.—Same Tree as Shown in Fig. 17 After Receiving HeavyDormant Pruning at the Beginning of the Experiment. 28 W. VA. AGRL EXPERIMENT STATION [Bulletin 158 TABLE XVI.—Character of Annual Terminal Growth andAmount of Wood Removed. HeavyPruning Moder- Light ate Pruning Pruning York Imperial HeavyPruning Moder-atePruning LightPruning Length in inches, 1911 growth Average growth in inches, 1912-15 Diameter in inches, 1911 growth Ave. diameter in
The apple as affected by varying degrees of dormant and seasonal pruning . Fig. 17.—Arkansas Tree Before Pruning at the Beginning of the Fig. 18.—Same Tree as Shown in Fig. 17 After Receiving HeavyDormant Pruning at the Beginning of the Experiment. 28 W. VA. AGRL EXPERIMENT STATION [Bulletin 158 TABLE XVI.—Character of Annual Terminal Growth andAmount of Wood Removed. HeavyPruning Moder- Light ate Pruning Pruning York Imperial HeavyPruning Moder-atePruning LightPruning Length in inches, 1911 growth Average growth in inches, 1912-15 Diameter in inches, 1911 growth Ave. diameter in inches, 1912-15 growth Wood per tree annually removed in lbs. 1912-15_. .156 .189 I crop of York Imperial. The latter variety fruited so heavilyin 1914 that it produced no fruit at all the following year. Aspreviously mentioned the freeze in 1913 destroyed all thecrop in the region of this experiment, and while a light cropbadly affected with cedar rust was borne in 1912 no recordsregarding it were taken since its formatio
Size: 1822px × 1371px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookidappleasaffectedb158alde
