The British journal of dermatology . umourof fairly firm consistency, movalile with the skin and apparently not invading thederma to any great extent: in short, a tumour which clinically was indistinguish-able from a non-pigmented mole (Fig. 4). There were no milium-like bodiesevident and none was present elsewhere on the face. The growth was firstapparent five years previously and had progressed slowly. No other memljer ofthe family was similarly affected and no fresh lesions had appeared up to twoyears ago. Microscopically the section was almost identical with Brookes ()original drawings (Fi
The British journal of dermatology . umourof fairly firm consistency, movalile with the skin and apparently not invading thederma to any great extent: in short, a tumour which clinically was indistinguish-able from a non-pigmented mole (Fig. 4). There were no milium-like bodiesevident and none was present elsewhere on the face. The growth was firstapparent five years previously and had progressed slowly. No other memljer ofthe family was similarly affected and no fresh lesions had appeared up to twoyears ago. Microscopically the section was almost identical with Brookes ()original drawings (Fig. 5). (x) The second, a woman, aged 54 years, in 1917, presented a similar, thoughlaiger and more indurated, tumour in the same situation. The growth hadapi^eared in childhood. There were no milia present. The family history wasnegative and no other lesions have since developed. (xi) The third, a woman, aged 42 years, in 1916, presented in the left nasolabialfurrow a small tumour Avhich liad existed since childhood. It had recently. X
Size: 1955px × 1278px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1880, booksubjectsyphilis, bookyear188
