Ontario Sessional Papers, 1920, . hn , Thos. R. , stucco finish. Cost, $3, Loan, $3, Comments by the Architectural Department. Pl.\x W. It has clearly been the intention of the owner of this house to have as much ofthe ground floor devoted to combination living room and dining room as possible. The rear door to kitchen is not necessary. A small window in the side wall ot the kitchen would improve ventilation. The over-all size of this plan, namely, 22 ft. by 26 ft., would have given amplearea on the upper floor for three bedrooms according to


Ontario Sessional Papers, 1920, . hn , Thos. R. , stucco finish. Cost, $3, Loan, $3, Comments by the Architectural Department. Pl.\x W. It has clearly been the intention of the owner of this house to have as much ofthe ground floor devoted to combination living room and dining room as possible. The rear door to kitchen is not necessary. A small window in the side wall ot the kitchen would improve ventilation. The over-all size of this plan, namely, 22 ft. by 26 ft., would have given amplearea on the upper floor for three bedrooms according to the sizes called for underthe Act. The shape ot the living room might be criticized by some clients but properlytreated it could be made very attractive. Windows on either side of the fireplacedo not make the most comfortable appearing fireplace, nor the most comfortable inactual practice as a certain amount of draught is always to be expected aroundwindow openings, even when they are closed. 82 lU i;K.\r OK .MrXUllAL affaiks Xo. 65 wr :i. H^*- rRDlT [^!V/kTiON -


Size: 1830px × 1365px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookauthorontariol, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1920, bookyear1920