(The) historicity of the resurrection of Jesus . ual writers, and turn to the attempts that have beer 1 nade at some sort of synthesis from this analysis. Ar 1 interesting reconstruction is made by Lake. Under four heads he considers the whole field. The first is of the burial. Of this there are two originals, the Markan and the Johannine. These agree in ascribing the burial to Josepl 1 of Arimathea, and in placing the grave near the site of tl: le crucifixion. In further detail - bhe nature of the tomb and the manner of the burial narratives are contra- dictory. In Mark the grave is hex
(The) historicity of the resurrection of Jesus . ual writers, and turn to the attempts that have beer 1 nade at some sort of synthesis from this analysis. Ar 1 interesting reconstruction is made by Lake. Under four heads he considers the whole field. The first is of the burial. Of this there are two originals, the Markan and the Johannine. These agree in ascribing the burial to Josepl 1 of Arimathea, and in placing the grave near the site of tl: le crucifixion. In further detail - bhe nature of the tomb and the manner of the burial narratives are contra- dictory. In Mark the grave is hex:n out of the rock, oae Dody lo wrapped unanointed in a shroud, and Joseph, a member of the Sanhedrin is the chief person involved in the buricl of Jesus. Joseph is hardly a disciple, but is interested ii 1 this procedure because rules of the Jews were still v Dry strict about this fulfilling of the Law of Deuteronomy. In John the grave is a kind of Mausoleum and into it the bod y of Jesus was placed by two of His Disciples. In Lake s >. 23 : Iniiid the Markan Is the preferable choice. It is older, and after it the other accounts continued to a development as we find in John is toth clear ..md natural. It is clear from the Gospels that the belief thatJesus would be raise.! from the dead was not cozimon. It isImpossible to find room for this in the earliest ciccount of the guard at the .omb came out of the earliestI controversies in which Jews tried to assert that Christiansh^ the body of ohrist. This story arose ag a naturalrefutation. It was, in the words of Professor Lake, a li fragment of controversy. The second event of the reconstruction is that Icentered about the tomb on the bhird day. no two ac-counts re .lly aerree. ihe . robability stronglyfavors ::ark, and others fall into place in an intelligibletho complicated of development. In regard to the!places of the appearances, Luke and Jo
Size: 1454px × 1718px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1920, bookidthehistorici, bookyear1922
