. Interpretation of dental & maxillary roentgenograms . Fig. 35.—Method of mounting stereoscopic films so that they may be adjusted tr desired Fig. 36.—Hand stereoscope. nearer object apparently moves in the opposite is further brought out by continuing the lines ofobservation through each object on to a screen as indi-cated in the diagram. (Fig. 37.) Applying this principle now to roentgenograph^ films, <() [INTERPRETATION OF ROENTGENOGRAMS if an unerupted tooth is to the lingual side of the otherteeth; , farther away from the source of the ray, and two films
. Interpretation of dental & maxillary roentgenograms . Fig. 35.—Method of mounting stereoscopic films so that they may be adjusted tr desired Fig. 36.—Hand stereoscope. nearer object apparently moves in the opposite is further brought out by continuing the lines ofobservation through each object on to a screen as indi-cated in the diagram. (Fig. 37.) Applying this principle now to roentgenograph^ films, <() [INTERPRETATION OF ROENTGENOGRAMS if an unerupted tooth is to the lingual side of the otherteeth; , farther away from the source of the ray, and two films are made, one a little farther to the right thanthe other, the unerupted tooth in the second film will ap-pear to he farther to the right than in the first film. Onthe other hand, if the unerupted tooth lies to the labialside of the other teeth, i. e., nearer the tube, it will appearto be farther to the left in the second film f han in the locating unerupted canine teeth, which frequentlygive no other indications whatever as to their Lingual orlabial situation, this principle yields valuable assistance,in cases where stereoscopic films
Size: 1770px × 1411px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookidinte, booksubjectdentistry
