. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . Fig. 135. Fig. 136. Fig. 135. Age of patient, seventeen. Retained upper, second, temporary molar. The radiograph shows that the second bicuspid is present in the jaw. Fig. 136. Age of patient, twenty-one. Retained lower, second, temporary molar with a large cavity in the crown of the tooth and the roots almost entirely resorbed, despite the fact that there is no oncoming second bicuspid. ceeding bicuspid. Fig. 135, however, shows the bicuspid to be half-tone may not do so, but the negative now before me has per-spective
. Elementary and dental radiography / by Howard Riley Raper . Fig. 135. Fig. 136. Fig. 135. Age of patient, seventeen. Retained upper, second, temporary molar. The radiograph shows that the second bicuspid is present in the jaw. Fig. 136. Age of patient, twenty-one. Retained lower, second, temporary molar with a large cavity in the crown of the tooth and the roots almost entirely resorbed, despite the fact that there is no oncoming second bicuspid. ceeding bicuspid. Fig. 135, however, shows the bicuspid to be half-tone may not do so, but the negative now before me has per-spective enough for me to see that the bicuspid is being deflected towardthe lingual. The deciduous tooth was extracted and the bicuspid eruptedpromptly. Case—young man, age twenty-one, lower, sec-Tig. 136. ond, deciduous molar with pulp exposed. Question:Should the tooth be treated, filled and retained inthe mouth, or extracted to make room for the second bicuspid? demonstrates the futility of attempting to treat the tooth—its rootsare almost entirely r
Size: 1596px × 1564px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., book, bookauthorraperhowardriley, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910
