American journal of pharmacy . h meritorious work even nominally de-pendent on an official who may not know anything about the matter. Henry Lkffmann. A Critical Revision of the Genus Eucalyptus. By J. , , , ^.S., Government Botanist of NewSouth Wales and Director of the Botanic Gardens, Sydney. , Part 2. This constitutes part XLH of the complete work, whichwe have reviewed from time to time as the parts have been present contribution to this monographic study of the interest-ing Genus Eucalyptus covers the following species: E. eximiaSchauer; E. peltat
American journal of pharmacy . h meritorious work even nominally de-pendent on an official who may not know anything about the matter. Henry Lkffmann. A Critical Revision of the Genus Eucalyptus. By J. , , , ^.S., Government Botanist of NewSouth Wales and Director of the Botanic Gardens, Sydney. , Part 2. This constitutes part XLH of the complete work, whichwe have reviewed from time to time as the parts have been present contribution to this monographic study of the interest-ing Genus Eucalyptus covers the following species: E. eximiaSchauer; E. peltata Bentham; E. Watsoniana F. v. M.; E. trachyphloiaF. V. M.; E. hybrida Maiden; E. Kruseana F. v. M.; E, Dawsoni;R. T. Baker; E. polyanthemos Schauer; E. conica Deane and Maiden;E. concolor Schauer. The same style of description and excellence of illustrations thatcharacterize the former parts of this voluminous study are exhibitedin the part now before us. G. M. B. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY^ DECEMBER, ig20 ^ ^CCOy ^ 192. EDITORIAL. ; WANTED—BOOSTERS FOJl PHARMACY The columns of the current issues of some of the pharmaceuticaljournals again confirm the comment made by a non-interestedobserver that much of the pharmaceutical literature of the day hasa pessimistic tendency that is far from beneficial to the progress ofpharmacy. In the past, we have expressed our opinion of theevil of disparagement^ and the injury that pharmacy was sustain-ing from the continuous and deliberate knocks in print and pub-lic utterances and the disparagements appearing in pharmaceuticaljournals. It is with chagrin and regret that we note another ofthese periodical storms of disparagement and observe that theshowers are descending upon the American Pharmaceutical As-sociation, our esteemed contemporary, The Journal of the A. Ph. A.,and the management thereof. We take no exception whatever to any proper comment, objec-tion, or even censure. On the contrary, we believ^e that construc-tive critici
Size: 1881px × 1328px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookidamerica, booksubjectpharmacy, bookyear1835
