. Wacker's manual of the plan of Chicago; municipal economy . side of the street, andto be 216 feet wide north of the river, takingthe property for the widening from thewest side of Pine street; upper street tostretch from property line to property lineboth on north and south sides of the river, that eighteen public hearings have beenscheduled and abandoned by the Board ofLocal Improvements on this case, and thatin fairness to the property interests alongthe zone of the proposed improvement,which have been seriously menaced duringthis long agitation and these many delays,that some action would
. Wacker's manual of the plan of Chicago; municipal economy . side of the street, andto be 216 feet wide north of the river, takingthe property for the widening from thewest side of Pine street; upper street tostretch from property line to property lineboth on north and south sides of the river, that eighteen public hearings have beenscheduled and abandoned by the Board ofLocal Improvements on this case, and thatin fairness to the property interests alongthe zone of the proposed improvement,which have been seriously menaced duringthis long agitation and these many delays,that some action would have to be taken bythe city at the conclusion of this hearing,the Executive Committee of the ChicagoPlan Commission after a series of recentconferences with all interests concerned,met in executive session July 6, 1911, andagain reviewed all conditions, plans andobjections and voted unanimously in favorof what is known to the Commission as PlanNo. 3, to be hereinafter described. At a meeting of the Plan Commission asa whole, held July 10, 1911, a unanimous. ?z^vr:si^-^.VX-::-3£yA-^y--:^tr:^;iaiiKiaiiiA Proposed double deck bridge for north and south boulevard connection Michigan Avenue and MichiganAvenue projected. the inclines to upper street to start fromEandolph and Ohio streets; grades of in-cline as follows: Eandolph street to Lakestreet per cent, from Ohio street to Indi-ana street per cent; balance of upperstreet to be practically level. I want to repeat that at all of the de-liberations of the Plan Committee of theCommercial Club and of the ExecutiveCommittee of the Chicago Plan Commis-sion there has not been a single dissentingvoice to the plan just outlined. It has al-ways and unanimously been declared as theonly practical plan. Eealizing, however, vote was had, ratifying the action of theExecutive Committee in the adoption ofPlan No. 3 as being the final plan the Chi-cago Plan Commission would stand for andrecommend to your honorable body foradoption and ex
Size: 1464px × 1707px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjectpublicworks, bookyear
