Dictionary of Greek and Roman geography . no otherwitness to this fact than Becker himself, who saysof this work, Propterea cavendum est diligenter,ne, quoties plura simul templa nominantur, eodemea ordine juncta fuisse arbitremur. (Z>e Mw-is,&c., p. 12, note.) But thirdly, Becker proceeds: This argument obtains greater certainty from theinscriptions collected by the Anonymous of Ein-siedlen. Fortunately, the entire inscriptions of allthe three temples are preseiTed, which may be stillpartly read on the ruins. They run as follows: Senatus popnlusque Eomanus incendio consumptumrestituit Divo
Dictionary of Greek and Roman geography . no otherwitness to this fact than Becker himself, who saysof this work, Propterea cavendum est diligenter,ne, quoties plura simul templa nominantur, eodemea ordine juncta fuisse arbitremur. (Z>e Mw-is,&c., p. 12, note.) But thirdly, Becker proceeds: This argument obtains greater certainty from theinscriptions collected by the Anonymous of Ein-siedlen. Fortunately, the entire inscriptions of allthe three temples are preseiTed, which may be stillpartly read on the ruins. They run as follows: Senatus popnlusque Eomanus incendio consumptumrestituit Divo Vespasiano Augusto||. s. p. q. r. Severus et Antoninus pii felic Aug. restitue-runt.|| aedem Concordiae vetustate coUapsamin meliorem faciem opera et cultu splendidiore re-stituerunt. Now as the whole of the first inscrip-tion, with the exception of the last three words, Divo Vespasiano Augusto, are still to be readover the eight columns, and the letters estitvek,a fragment of restituerunt in the second inscrip-. TAEULAUIUM AND TEMPLES OF VESPASIAN, SATtlUM AND CONCORD, 782 ro:ma. tiou, over tlie tliree columns, Becker rrcarJs the(.rtler of the Notitia as fully confirmed, and tl:e threetemples to be respectively those of Concord, Ves-pasian and Titus, and Saturn. With regard to these inscriptions all are agreedthat the third. ;is here divided, belongs to tlie templer)f Concord; but with regard to the proper divisionof the first two, there is great difference of and Becker divide them as above, butCanina {Foro Rom. p. 179) contends that the firstfinislies at the word restituit, and that thewords from Divo A^espasiano down to restitue-runt form the second inscription, belonging to thetemjjle of Vespasian and Titus. In the containing the inscriptions, which is in thelibrary of Einsiedlen, they are written consecutively,without any mark where one begins and anotherends; so that the divisions in subsequent copies aremerely arbitrary
Size: 1952px × 1281px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorsmithwil, bookcentury1800, bookdecade1850, bookyear1854
