. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. f^'^'E^i^^r-^,''"' 'Â¥, ^. â 6âCOURT OP queen's BENOH. m stood, and the issaes it Lo trial. It i& lia respect in- ff trial under ;hat objection J at the time; - eat authority ot (1 Q. L- B. â¢, of course, its loes not reach wsked whether npt>;*an4^*hey i^ partly false. if they' ,mijl;ht 1^ true and the jiif y said it a, therefore, re- had said they ; and it would, to ask them to judge of course think he acted >aTties asked it; I been that they sras material as âºuld hav9 been en
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. f^'^'E^i^^r-^,''"' 'Â¥, ^. â 6âCOURT OP queen's BENOH. m stood, and the issaes it Lo trial. It i& lia respect in- ff trial under ;hat objection J at the time; - eat authority ot (1 Q. L- B. â¢, of course, its loes not reach wsked whether npt>;*an4^*hey i^ partly false. if they' ,mijl;ht 1^ true and the jiif y said it a, therefore, re- had said they ; and it would, to ask them to judge of course think he acted >aTties asked it; I been that they sras material as âºuld hav9 been enquired I, that is to say judgment upon isV^mifldirectiolX otbS referred to. id the other mo^ kion. \ -\ 461 IIWl R. S. Weir, for intervening party. .< dj. Dnherty, Q. C, and Kavanagh for the Scottish Union jâM,ââ Insurance ComoanT. _ "* i" °" Insurance Company May 28, 1890.) DoBioN, C. J°, and Crosh, J., after referring to the cir- cumstances of the case, expressed the opiuion that the judgment of the Court of Review was correct, and that I the appeal shouM be dismissed. ' Judgment confirmed. ⢠Trtmhotme, Taylor Sf ^urhan for the Royal Institution, appellant. V » ' H. J. Knmnagh for the Scottish Union and National In- surance Co., respondent. _ R 8. Weir for Barrington et al., intervening. ⢠(JK.) ⢠Suottlth Union. May 21, 1890. CofjWi DoRioN, C. J,)Tessieb,'Crosh, Bossfi, Dohebty. JJ. Li^^^^^ DE LAPAROISSE DK \^ STEGENEVIfitE, (Petition^ in Court below), Al'PEIillANT ; â¢-^. AMD LA CdUR DE CIRCUIT, {Ikfendatit in Court below), AND i,vN-. â â â/ GODFROI BOILEAU, .. ^\. {Mis en cause in Court beUfw),^ "^ \ RESPONDEi^ Prohibition to prevent execution of judgmentâDiscretionâ .'"-â â ' AppealâCircuit Court. \^ ⢠_ H»LD:âAfflrndling the jadgment of Gill, J., M. L. R., 5 8, C^417,'W^wre n then has been no ^ea to thu jnriadiction, and no demand has been made for a wdt of prohibition vhile the caae wta pending
Size: 1525px × 1638px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
