. The relation of the size of the class to school room efficiency. ed classes. group. total. oercentages. 10 or 1 ess. 4 11 - 15 2 16 - 20 4 21 - 25 4 26-30 7 TO. 6 31. 6 31 - 35 12 49. 8 36 - 45 16 2 4. 2 46 - 55 13 9 4. a 56 - up. 4 100. 66 TOO. See Figure XXXV for graphic repres entation of the above. The above table should be read,- 4 maximum average scoresout of a possible 66, or 6% of all maximum scores were made byclasses with an enrollment of TO pupils or less, 2,or 5% of allmaximum scores were made in classes of from n to 15 pur>
. The relation of the size of the class to school room efficiency. ed classes. group. total. oercentages. 10 or 1 ess. 4 11 - 15 2 16 - 20 4 21 - 25 4 26-30 7 TO. 6 31. 6 31 - 35 12 49. 8 36 - 45 16 2 4. 2 46 - 55 13 9 4. a 56 - up. 4 100. 66 TOO. See Figure XXXV for graphic repres entation of the above. The above table should be read,- 4 maximum average scoresout of a possible 66, or 6% of all maximum scores were made byclasses with an enrollment of TO pupils or less, 2,or 5% of allmaximum scores were made in classes of from n to 15 pur>ils,etc. It will be noted that the largest percentage of maximum scoreswas made in classes of from 31 to 55 pupils, and that the highestsingle percentage falls in the 36 to 45 class group. These factshowever, are not significant when one considers that there aremaximum scores made in classes of every size, only about one-fourthof all the highest scores being made in classes of from 36 to 45pupils. Distribution of Glasses and pupilsAccording to Size of less 15 20 25 30 35 45 55 of XXXVI. Distribution of Maximum Scores accordingSize of Classes.
Size: 1896px × 1317px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, booksubjecttheses, bookyear1914
