. Central Valley Project Improvement Act : hearing before the Subcommittee on Water and Power Resources of the Committee on Resources, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on 1906, a bill to amend the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, and for other purposes, July 20, 1995--Washington, DC. Central Valley Project (Calif. ); Water resources development -- Law and legislation California Central Valley (Valley); Water-supply -- California Central Valley (Valley); Irrigation water -- California Central Valley (Valley); Fish habitat improvement -- Californi
. Central Valley Project Improvement Act : hearing before the Subcommittee on Water and Power Resources of the Committee on Resources, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, on 1906, a bill to amend the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, and for other purposes, July 20, 1995--Washington, DC. Central Valley Project (Calif. ); Water resources development -- Law and legislation California Central Valley (Valley); Water-supply -- California Central Valley (Valley); Irrigation water -- California Central Valley (Valley); Fish habitat improvement -- California Central Valley (Valley); Fishes -- Conservation Economic aspects California Central Valley (Valley). 145. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Drawer 1268 (916) 623-1217 WEAVERVILLE, CALIFORNIA 96093 Dero B. Fortlund, Clerk Jcannie NixTemph, Administratiue Officer TESTIMONY OF TRINITY COUNTY. CALIFORNIA. IN TO THE TRINITY PROVISIONS OF HR. 1906 The Trinity County Board of Supervisors opposes the deleterious alteration of the Riggs Amendment to the Central Valley Project Improvement Act which is proposed by 1906. The alteration does nothing to improve the Trinity River Flow Decision addressed by the Riggs Amendment (Section 3406<b)(23)), and is a thinly veiled attempt to delay implementation of that vitally important decision. The alteration would add needless bureaucratic procedure, paperwork, and costs onto an already open, public process that has taken nearly 15 years and millions of dollars to complete. Continued delay of the Interior Secretary's 1996 Trinity River Flow Decision is, in essence, continuance of a "taking" against the people and economies of Trinity County, the Klamath-Trinity basin, and the Northern California-Southern Oregon coastal region. When the Trinity Division was proposed in the 1950s, the people of Trinity County were promised that "not one bucketful" of Trinity River water necessary in the basin would be exported
Size: 2774px × 901px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookcollectionaddition, bookcollectionamericana
