. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . i the i^roijid on Uieaaat a;de of the h^jd >lill mi cofint out ita western confinee. ^ . I thiini- in it** natural aUte tho water on the aa^t sidumoved aoae-sat freer than on the wat aide; nd wnen i say. \ i ^^^ txii^r aoijUB?/ at fnv r, it iii caeijal only i- rrniftrison; be-CtkUStJ tliti., c , un .;w *;$ot Bir:o wa^^ Jbructoti in teflow ., I» V-(.ro an. ^ffoTdet touchijig ;i;.l circuia-
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . i the i^roijid on Uieaaat a;de of the h^jd >lill mi cofint out ita western confinee. ^ . I thiini- in it** natural aUte tho water on the aa^t sidumoved aoae-sat freer than on the wat aide; nd wnen i say. \ i ^^^ txii^r aoijUB?/ at fnv r, it iii caeijal only i- rrniftrison; be-CtkUStJ tliti., c , un .;w *;$ot Bir:o wa^^ Jbructoti in teflow ., I» V-(.ro an. ^ffoTdet touchijig ;i;.l circuia-stonco by w.^* a^ ,^ cu of the ?»at« on tiia 088t A, I t3^»ink thij bi-nt of ^%t ir t^e &v= e&rancaof the ;..ii «, ^ilichj *• en tst^.i-ea, t;:i »/att;- risbb10 above tho f^ounti, Hctf^yor en *.»& eide we havt* diraibo the appearaiiCt of .hfi cionegau on the ea&t fact; of th©Red lill, which disc; argoa KJE x CGniiidwr&blc adairsiifiMX i?«sitar, ana th»y wer« tho wjiM^ ©lavj., as t))? wail, :oiy,1410. Aiici coBiins^ to tiJto all these nwitterr ilto noneido a-tion, I dont know htth r I r>cJLd ij:-onoj,rico one channelmcrti fray flow than iha other, 0 V ut about ^he i| cf water paeein^; do^n the twoaid^^e? likv^i ;ou isriy opinion or vit!-^ on subject? Q. At th
Size: 1284px × 1945px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
