. Carnegie Institution of Washington publication. W F,, DxW F,,DxW •. Grade, 0 I 4 5 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 IS 16 17 TEXT-FIGURE 1. heterozygotes like the young recorded in table 22. Their mean grade is very similar, as against The latter are evidently homozy- gous white like the young of table 19. They have a similar but slightly lower mean grade, viz, as against This result indicates a 1 : 1 segregation of white and dark Dutch and that accordingly white and dark are allelomorphs. If so, an F2 generation should show a 3 : 1 segregation. To test this point we may summariz
. Carnegie Institution of Washington publication. W F,, DxW F,,DxW •. Grade, 0 I 4 5 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 IS 16 17 TEXT-FIGURE 1. heterozygotes like the young recorded in table 22. Their mean grade is very similar, as against The latter are evidently homozy- gous white like the young of table 19. They have a similar but slightly lower mean grade, viz, as against This result indicates a 1 : 1 segregation of white and dark Dutch and that accordingly white and dark are allelomorphs. If so, an F2 generation should show a 3 : 1 segregation. To test this point we may summarize from. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Carnegie Institution of Washington. Washington, Carnegie Institution of Washington
Size: 1920px × 1302px
Photo credit: © Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorcarnegie, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookyear1902
