TransactionsPublished under the care of the General Secretary and the Treasurer . Motor Side Generator Side Fig. 2.— Diagram showing effects of armature currents iv mobdeys TEST. poles and weakens the generator poles, the impressed excitation ofthe motor poles must be smaller than the impressed excitation ofthe generator poles, and this can be effected as shown in Fig. 3, bysplitting the field-coils into two sets of an equal number, excitedwith different field currents. Fig. 4 shows the effect of the armaturereaction on the poles. Both in Figs. 2 and 4, the wavy line A repre-sents the field pr

---

TransactionsPublished under the care of the General Secretary and the Treasurer . Motor Side Generator Side Fig. 2.— Diagram showing effects of armature currents iv mobdeys TEST. poles and weakens the generator poles, the impressed excitation ofthe motor poles must be smaller than the impressed excitation ofthe generator poles, and this can be effected as shown in Fig. 3, bysplitting the field-coils into two sets of an equal number, excitedwith different field currents. Fig. 4 shows the effect of the armaturereaction on the poles. Both in Figs. 2 and 4, the wavy line A repre-sents the field produced by the armature current alone, and thewavy line R represents the resultant magnetic field. 532 BEHREND: TESTING Fig. 3.— Diagram fob the authors combination of coirs fob CIRCULATING POWER. EevolvingField I R=KesultaDt Field for unegnal exciting currents

---

Size: 1698px × 1471px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidtr, booksubjectelectricity