. Report of the State Entomologist of Connecticut for the year ... . .015 25% Mixed .12 Isomer .06 .03 .015 Rhothane .12 .06 .03 .015 Benzene .12 Hexachloride .06 .03 .015 67—DDT .12 .06 .03 .015 67—DDT .12 + 1% Wetting .06 Agent .03 .015 72.
. Report of the State Entomologist of Connecticut for the year ... . .015 25% Mixed .12 Isomer .06 .03 .015 Rhothane .12 .06 .03 .015 Benzene .12 Hexachloride .06 .03 .015 67—DDT .12 .06 .03 .015 67—DDT .12 + 1% Wetting .06 Agent .03 .015 Check 1 Indicates tubers rotted in ground. 2 Per cent damage to control. 61 Table 23. Comparison of Two Commercial DDT Preparations in Control OF HOUSEFLIES DDT Per Cent Kill Avmw Treatment Cone. 1 2 3 4 Per cent kill .25%. .25%. 100 lOQr. .0312 .0625 .125 % DDT -LOG SCALE .25 Figure 3. Toxicity of two commercial DDT preparations to houseflies in the laboratory. 62 FLEA BEETLES LEAF HOPPERS
Size: 1456px × 1717px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidreportofstat, bookyear1901
