. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . ou nxike any rsej:«uremsT)t of it in thb aarly dJijS? A, H^, erj n<m* ^h t I ro:H:r:be of norf. Q, K«vfl veil obBSrvtiO \.non^ A» yv. II, iu I r • 0, Abo*it hov ftr do^m h&ve yo».i poan it fiow? A. i^VjJI, it iaa £^/m« d-wn the Cucanon^ wfei^ pat^t the Rodmil cormidorable at timoa, and at oth«r tijiws it wcuidnHrttaoh to the 3pri»v?» or hill, Q. ^ka it varied f<*ora year to y©iar in distanco to sfaich itwould c
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . ou nxike any rsej:«uremsT)t of it in thb aarly dJijS? A, H^, erj n<m* ^h t I ro:H:r:be of norf. Q, K«vfl veil obBSrvtiO \.non^ A» yv. II, iu I r • 0, Abo*it hov ftr do^m h&ve yo».i poan it fiow? A. i^VjJI, it iaa £^/m« d-wn the Cucanon^ wfei^ pat^t the Rodmil cormidorable at timoa, and at oth«r tijiws it wcuidnHrttaoh to the 3pri»v?» or hill, Q. ^ka it varied f<*ora year to y©iar in distanco to sfaich itwould cocrc ao*ii before siiiking, ever sinc^ yon ave taiov,ii it? ^ . Y««, , Q. And tit rii?fdrfu\t eeaaons int^ti awriC yiw-r? ^. ffia, fiir. He-Direc t Exajairia ti on• 5lr» Haakall: C» T^^iat water ha- ftil beon divart-ad by t<hawatar flystttria in T^he suriinor aaaon the Cuca2aon?;;a a? A. Practically« Q. kx)L\ no wato r would lov paat iio jpoint of diversion? A, Not in tjivi lart fav yuara; ithaB beon pretty aoII takenup,.
Size: 1287px × 1942px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
