. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . at ou know ab<at (be rainfall of the entire pres-ent season up to within a few days or sot, of the whole perio. M2t covered by >& observctiona on Eichibit 11 ;ind Exhibit 58? A. I know Uiem waB a good rain in October, last fall,-- 1907—and pracwically only one #) wer sine:; until ^^irfsent Novem^^e and T)ocenber t^tere was no rainfall of any conse-quence • Q. From those measureEionts on exiiibit
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . at ou know ab<at (be rainfall of the entire pres-ent season up to within a few days or sot, of the whole perio. M2t covered by >& observctiona on Eichibit 11 ;ind Exhibit 58? A. I know Uiem waB a good rain in October, last fall,-- 1907—and pracwically only one #) wer sine:; until ^^irfsent Novem^^e and T)ocenber t^tere was no rainfall of any conse-quence • Q. From those measureEionts on exiiibit 6 and ex)-iibit 11, car-Ijied on to thi: eiiubit 56, v-at is yiTjr .pinion as to as the (iucsnionfia Sprin,?^? Mr. Chapuan: We make ths sticia objection to that as .itness is asked an opinion upon tho Iwo facts which heha-i statisd am not u^on hxs (^oin rai obao vation of hecountry and of all the factors which have influencedtiie action of those wells. The Court: Objection uverrulud. Def indent excejjts. A. Tjie e is no doubt it di minimile the water belo^ it. 0. ^^r. Wri;idrt, you ^ave boon observing tliose Cucasionj^u
Size: 1288px × 1939px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
