. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. MAy 4, 1922 The Florists^ Review 43 inmicdiatc riiciusurt's for r.'licf from |,r,"St"iit drastic restrictions complained curtailment of private or coninier- ,.ial i)iant and bull) inijjortations. The resolution further stated that the boani „f directors was ^iviiiK this re((uest no ])ress publicity and awaited the sec- retary's views and action on the ques- tion "so vital to the increase! and proj;- icss of the florists' industry. An earnest discussion followed the nadiiif,' of the resolution. Many thoiij;lit it was entirely out of t


. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. MAy 4, 1922 The Florists^ Review 43 inmicdiatc riiciusurt's for r.'licf from |,r,"St"iit drastic restrictions complained curtailment of private or coninier- ,.ial i)iant and bull) inijjortations. The resolution further stated that the boani „f directors was ^iviiiK this re((uest no ])ress publicity and awaited the sec- retary's views and action on the ques- tion "so vital to the increase! and proj;- icss of the florists' industry. An earnest discussion followed the nadiiif,' of the resolution. Many thoiij;lit it was entirely out of the scojx' of the executive board and was a iiiKwtion for the convention, and this icclinK seemed to prev;iil. Finally, on motion of Robert I'yle, seconded by W. 1{. I'ierson, the icsolution was laid ,111 the Third Session. The first business of tlie tliiiil si'S- sioM, nioruiiiy, was the ri|i(prt of' the committee in regard to the I'lori lultiir.'il fMiib of the rni\cisity of Ilii iiois. r. It. Klint^sponi read the report, wliicli to the rtVecl that the oiyiilii- /at ion of a Junior S. A. I', as oiitiiuccl ilhl not |iromisc benelits ot' real \alue til the society suHicient to justify siieli a |ir(M-eedini;, but the cummittee beiie\ei| lliat it' the student iin(i\- liad ultimate iriembership in the society in \ iew , it wdnld be of more lienelit, mu1iiall\', I hi llie students to join the society a- >-ooll as elii;ibh'. W. 11. ('ul|l lllo\ei| the .'idoption ol' the ri'port, and his nuitioii was si'conded. .\fter ;i proldnecj di^ iiissioii, however, in which those ; |iart expresse(l syinp;ithy with the ul' tlie students to connect with the ^o ciety in soin(> way, .1. F. .\ni}n;inn moved in amendment to Mr. Culp's motion that :i committee of three lie .i]ip(dnted to confei' with the st\idents' re|u-esent,i ti\cs bel'ore the meet iuji ;it Kansas ('ily and rejtort on recommendat ions at ineetiufj. The ;iniendnient. wliicli was ac


Size: 1391px × 1797px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecad, booksubjectfloriculture, bookyear1912