United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit . INVENTOR. 1492 Arthur G. VVillard et al. vs. (No Model.) No. M. BEAL. CORE DRILLING MACHINERY. 2 Sheets—Sheet 2. Patented July 23, <^^ %,rrU llfVEHTOR. / arioiis Pcfriulaiits. 149.^ United States Patent Office. MOSES 13EAL, OF ELY HI A, OHIO,CORE-DRILLING MACHINERY SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 543,227, dated July 23, 1895. ArDlication 61ed February e, 1894. Serial No. 499,255. No mo-lM. To all ivhoni it may cu)iccrii: Be it known that I, MosES Beal, a ciiizenof the United States, residing at Elyr
United States Court of Appeals For the Ninth Circuit . INVENTOR. 1492 Arthur G. VVillard et al. vs. (No Model.) No. M. BEAL. CORE DRILLING MACHINERY. 2 Sheets—Sheet 2. Patented July 23, <^^ %,rrU llfVEHTOR. / arioiis Pcfriulaiits. 149.^ United States Patent Office. MOSES 13EAL, OF ELY HI A, OHIO,CORE-DRILLING MACHINERY SPECIFICATION forming part of Letters Patent No. 543,227, dated July 23, 1895. ArDlication 61ed February e, 1894. Serial No. 499,255. No mo-lM. To all ivhoni it may cu)iccrii: Be it known that I, MosES Beal, a ciiizenof the United States, residing at Elyria, in tliecounty of Lorain and State of Ohio, have in-S vented certain new and useful Improvementsin Core-Drilling ^Machinery; and I do herebydeclare the following to be a full, clear, andexact description of the invention, such aswill enable others skilled in the art to which 10 it appertains to make and use the same. My invention relates to improvements incore-drilling machinery. The machine as organized and shown in thedrawings is a hand-drill, especially designed .45 for easy transportation to places where largermachinery could not be taken. Some of the improvements composing theinvention
Size: 1293px × 1932px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorunitedstatescourtofap, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910
