. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. 1 1 â ; 1 f 1 â¢â¢1 i- :â . â ⢠-"j?-^ " jr'^TTi^'Ji^^^s^CT 1800. _llaBM» BlMbfonL || !l ii Is-''"- \ MONTBSAL LAW RKP0BT8. then next, 1888, at a ire?ital of |188 per aonam. Thf^Iease t&eiefdre terminated on the let of May, 1889. *, After the termina:tion of the lease, the appellants re- fused to vacalte the preinises, and mor^ than three days elapsinft the respondetat on the 7th oi May, 1889, insti- tuted an action before the Oircnit Court (appealable) for the county of Huntingdo
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. 1 1 â ; 1 f 1 â¢â¢1 i- :â . â ⢠-"j?-^ " jr'^TTi^'Ji^^^s^CT 1800. _llaBM» BlMbfonL || !l ii Is-''"- \ MONTBSAL LAW RKP0BT8. then next, 1888, at a ire?ital of |188 per aonam. Thf^Iease t&eiefdre terminated on the let of May, 1889. *, After the termina:tion of the lease, the appellants re- fused to vacalte the preinises, and mor^ than three days elapsinft the respondetat on the 7th oi May, 1889, insti- tuted an action before the Oircnit Court (appealable) for the county of Huntingdon, alleging the termination of the lease and asking for the ejectment of the Appellants and the possession of his premises. ^ This action was dismissed upon an exception to the form, because the writ did not state the occupation of the respondent, by a judgment rendered on the 8rd of Sep- tember, 1889, reserving the respondent's right however to take a new action for the same cause, whereupon the respondent immdliately took the present action before the Superior Oourt at Beauharnois, which has concurrent jurisdiction with the Circuit Court, (appealable) for the county of'Huntingdon. / -5 The question of jurisdiction was not raised By any of the. pleadings; on the contrary the appellants toc^ an action en garantie against one Peter Macfarlane and plead- ed to tl\e merits. The respondent closed his enq«4te,md it was ouly when the appellants were being pressed to proceed with their enquitle and to avoid foreclosure that appellant's counsel for the first time made a«tva vl>ee ob- jection to the jurisdiction of the Superior Court on the ground |that the respondent's claim being only for $46 the Circuit Court had exclusive jurisdiction. This objection, was maintained by the, Superior Court, Beauharnois, but the Court of Review unaninitously reversed thit judg* ment from this judgment that the present appeal is taken. , The respondent's action is instituted i
Size: 2939px × 850px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
