. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . j4ii ?_ _- ttObBons for three yetao could fustoro uVm; ordinaj-y cundi-tiona; bouidea the draft throudi tho Kui;y Tunnel kept Ilbcontinuouii effect on Ue imter 8u_jvi,ly; in otht^r wrclr. thatwith the artificial diveraiona nt>v(.r t• e crifr^inal condi-tione c:Ji be rcDtor<;(i, ^vpti after three yeoi^fa und more yearsof iiioro thwn ordiiiai-y rainfall. f\ ^ that it q^ai-ra in thvj oric^ence tl^.-it btd
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . j4ii ?_ _- ttObBons for three yetao could fustoro uVm; ordinaj-y cundi-tiona; bouidea the draft throudi tho Kui;y Tunnel kept Ilbcontinuouii effect on Ue imter 8u_jvi,ly; in otht^r wrclr. thatwith the artificial diveraiona nt>v(.r t• e crifr^inal condi-tione c:Ji be rcDtor<;(i, ^vpti after three yeoi^fa und more yearsof iiioro thwn ordiiiai-y rainfall. f\ ^ that it q^ai-ra in thvj oric^ence tl^.-it btdv/Otn theyt)rfcbBed aome 40 foet, or in th&t noi#;!3hborhood, (mdt>at during; that time thoso or «. nuriibei of them hadboon diuin^^5 ^?^^^ irrigating aoa«on pum-xid witi uubstantialcontinuity, wJ^at is yom* view as to the cause of eachBubeidencc; of tho water i;lari<.?A, Tho aitifi(jial draft upon v/ator Hourcc,0. ^^ode by vbaf^ A. By ^i;, tine areiits ^i and 14, Q. Noiv, Htato -^wther from tliat tuba
Size: 1289px × 1938px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
