. A comparison of the nutrient content of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine trees. Plants Analysis; Botanical chemistry. Douglas- Fir I Douglas-Fir II Ponderosa Pine I j_ ; 12 16 20 24 28 32 TREE DIAMETER (IN) Figure magnesium in branches plotted by branch size class. Each point represents the mean value of two separate digestions and duplicate chemical analyses. Site I is a PSME/CAGE habitat type and site II is a ABLA/VAGL habitat type. < or CO 0. 09 - 0. 03 - M Ponderosa Pine I â¡ Douglas- Fir I mil Ponderosa Pine I â â Douglas- Fir 11. T W
. A comparison of the nutrient content of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine trees. Plants Analysis; Botanical chemistry. Douglas- Fir I Douglas-Fir II Ponderosa Pine I j_ ; 12 16 20 24 28 32 TREE DIAMETER (IN) Figure magnesium in branches plotted by branch size class. Each point represents the mean value of two separate digestions and duplicate chemical analyses. Site I is a PSME/CAGE habitat type and site II is a ABLA/VAGL habitat type. < or CO 0. 09 - 0. 03 - M Ponderosa Pine I â¡ Douglas- Fir I mil Ponderosa Pine I â â Douglas- Fir 11. T W 1-3' SIZE CLASS (IN) >3 11. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Clayton, James L. (James Lindow), 1942-; Kennedy, Debora A; Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station (Ogden, Utah); United States. Forest Service. Ogden, Utah : U. S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station
Size: 1314px × 1903px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthorunitedstatesforestservice, bookcentury1900, bookcollec
