. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. m Omirt Mount Roy* , ata. boolton. ic::: 288 MIONTRKAIi I«4W / \ " "We have paM over the money tcT'thii ne*w organisftno^,, " and yoQ have fio claim on ; ⢠. The qaestjons to be decided by the Goart are :â¢â ]»t. Had appellants a legal existence under the deed of 26th April, iVthT , .-.^''â '_â ..-^^ : â m â â ' :-J^.'4W' 2hd. Did the expelled members legally only change tno name of the society appellants, or di4.^ey go off from the original society, repudiate .their Cont^ect
. The Montreal law reports [microform]. Law reports, digests, etc; Law; Jurisprudence; Droit. m Omirt Mount Roy* , ata. boolton. ic::: 288 MIONTRKAIi I«4W / \ " "We have paM over the money tcT'thii ne*w organisftno^,, " and yoQ have fio claim on ; ⢠. The qaestjons to be decided by the Goart are :â¢â ]»t. Had appellants a legal existence under the deed of 26th April, iVthT , .-.^''â '_â ..-^^ : â m â â ' :-J^.'4W' 2hd. Did the expelled members legally only change tno name of the society appellants, or di4.^ey go off from the original society, repudiate .their Cont^ection with it and organize a new Mid tadopendent socicKlf inconsistent with the fundamental principles of t^e original body? ' Gould even the minority of the society secede, erect themselves into .a new corporation under a new name, dispose of the property of the original corporation, annul 4he original charter, thereby disfranchise the other mem- l^rs, and what ts the effect of such secession as regards the remaining members anii the rights and property of the corporation ? 4lh. Do the respondents now illegally retain from ap> pellants the sum of $ J ? That the appellants had a legal existence under the deed of 26th April, W[h, there can be no doubt. It isad- mitted in ree^pondents' pleas. As to the second qnostion.'the appellants submit that the pretended chango of name invoked by the respondents I is only a mere subterfuge adopted by the expelled mem- bers, under which they hoped, having possession of the funds of the original society, to be able to retain them. - This is apparent upon every page of the evidence given by respondents. They copsidered the: organisation po^v^ invoked by them, as a new ^nd independent society, jus'ln ao way connected with the original society appellants. The best proof of this is from, the evidence of ^respondent Bolton, though given reluctantly. After admitting that they had been expelled he saysâ \^\Qu^tion.âDid you
Size: 864px × 2893px
Photo credit: © The Book Worm / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., books, booksubjectdroit, booksubjectjurisprudence, booksubjectlaw
