Report of Committee on school inquiry, Board of estimate an apportionment, city of New York .. . /7\ fiV£ (^ 3 hhH «sl Co Co 7-A/ /7\/£ Figure D FIVE HUNDRED RECOMMENDATIONS 823 lined above. Dr. Maxwell said that he didnt want to disturb matters,because a change like the projxjsed one always brought on a row. Norecord was made of the motion. Then the Associate Superintendent sent for the District Superin-tendents Schauffler and OShea, whose territories were concerned in thematter, and they both agreed to the proposed change and resultingeconomies. At this juncture a member of the Local Sch
Report of Committee on school inquiry, Board of estimate an apportionment, city of New York .. . /7\ fiV£ (^ 3 hhH «sl Co Co 7-A/ /7\/£ Figure D FIVE HUNDRED RECOMMENDATIONS 823 lined above. Dr. Maxwell said that he didnt want to disturb matters,because a change like the projxjsed one always brought on a row. Norecord was made of the motion. Then the Associate Superintendent sent for the District Superin-tendents Schauffler and OShea, whose territories were concerned in thematter, and they both agreed to the proposed change and resultingeconomies. At this juncture a member of the Local School Board, under dateof June 23, 1911, placed the following objections to the plan before : (a) Fifty pupils is an excessive registration. (b) The strange environment would work harm. (c) There would be no actual economy. (d) It would be hard and unpleasant for the principal to decide who must go to the other school. Note : (a) Mr. OBrien claims that 49 is not excessive and that in this case thediscipline is exceptionally easy. (b) From 48th to 49th Streets is no great change in environ
Size: 1543px × 1619px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthornewyorkn, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookyear1913
