AMAarchives of neurology & psychiatry . Fig 2 (Case 2, W. C.).—Wound and cranial defect in left posterior superiorparietal region; incomplete right homonymous hemianopsia. Perimeter charts. SCARLETT-IXGHAM—riSUAL DEFECTS 231 and fundi were normal, and fixation was retained. \isual acuity: right eye20/20, left eye 20/20. Field charts made with a 5 mm. test object showedhomonymous hemianopsia extending to within degree of fixation made with bright lights and large moving objects revealed a slightdegree of retained vision throughout the affected fields. From the location ofthe cr
AMAarchives of neurology & psychiatry . Fig 2 (Case 2, W. C.).—Wound and cranial defect in left posterior superiorparietal region; incomplete right homonymous hemianopsia. Perimeter charts. SCARLETT-IXGHAM—riSUAL DEFECTS 231 and fundi were normal, and fixation was retained. \isual acuity: right eye20/20, left eye 20/20. Field charts made with a 5 mm. test object showedhomonymous hemianopsia extending to within degree of fixation made with bright lights and large moving objects revealed a slightdegree of retained vision throughout the affected fields. From the location ofthe cranial defect and the relative position of the metallic and bone fragments,it is apparent that the cerebral lesion involved the left occipital lobe near theupper margin at a considerable distance from the occipital pole. The destruc-tive effect of the wound was evidently downward, toward the optic radiationsof Gratiolet. C-KSE 3.—F. C. B., aged 23, was wounded Xov. 1, 1918, in the right occipitalregion, after which he was unconsci
Size: 1581px × 1581px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookpublisherchica, bookyear1919
