![](http://www.alamy.com/thumbs/6/F14AA77B-8A19-4F89-B8A3-C95258110866/2CRN0JA.jpg)
. Radiography and radio-therapeutics . FiG. 207.— lUiiliograiu offinger : aiitero - posteriorview. The fractui-e is notvisible in this position. Fuj. 208.—Ilit saiiu linger: lateral view. Showing fracture of posterior aspect at base of terminal phalanx of index finger. placement, are frequently unrecognisable under the screen. Figs. 207 to 209illustrate the difficulties of diagnosis if the screen is used with the hmb mone position only. Either of these injuries might have escaped detectionunder those circumstances. Figs. 207 and 208 show a fracture of the bone of the terminal phalanxof the ind
. Radiography and radio-therapeutics . FiG. 207.— lUiiliograiu offinger : aiitero - posteriorview. The fractui-e is notvisible in this position. Fuj. 208.—Ilit saiiu linger: lateral view. Showing fracture of posterior aspect at base of terminal phalanx of index finger. placement, are frequently unrecognisable under the screen. Figs. 207 to 209illustrate the difficulties of diagnosis if the screen is used with the hmb mone position only. Either of these injuries might have escaped detectionunder those circumstances. Figs. 207 and 208 show a fracture of the bone of the terminal phalanxof the index finger. In the antero-posterior view there is no sign of fracture,but in the lateral view the fracture shows distinctly. Fig. 209 shows a fracture of the fibula ; in a (antero-posterior view) no 237 238 KADIOGEAPHY injury can be detected. By everting the foot position b was obtained, anda well-marked fracture of the lower end of the fibula appears. These twocases well illustrate the importance of carefully examining all cases o
Size: 1583px × 1579px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookauthorknoxrobert18681928, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910