Transactions . W. P—. 10 mm. white. February 25tli, 1910. Fig. 8. W. P—. 10 mm. white. July 25th, 1907. 104 DETACHMENT OF THE RETINA. tract of his left eye wliicli led to the subsequent retinaldetachment of that eye, I am quite unable to explain howthe detachment arose. As I have mentioned there wasdoubtful evidence of choroidal mischief in the extremeperiphery of the fundus away from the detachment. I have not gone into statistics of my own cases, andsuch as I have cited have been mainly to illustrate pointsI wished to lay stress on. I have had some cases of cure—, not only reposit
Transactions . W. P—. 10 mm. white. February 25tli, 1910. Fig. 8. W. P—. 10 mm. white. July 25th, 1907. 104 DETACHMENT OF THE RETINA. tract of his left eye wliicli led to the subsequent retinaldetachment of that eye, I am quite unable to explain howthe detachment arose. As I have mentioned there wasdoubtful evidence of choroidal mischief in the extremeperiphery of the fundus away from the detachment. I have not gone into statistics of my own cases, andsuch as I have cited have been mainly to illustrate pointsI wished to lay stress on. I have had some cases of cure—, not only reposition of the retina, but also restorationof function—and while I would like to think that thesecures ave the result of my treatment, and while in my ownheart I may really believe that they are so, there must alwayslui-k behind that thought the knowledge that spontaneouscure occasionally takes place in this condition, and thesuspicion that these might have been cases which if leftalone would have got better. I can only say that havingbeen left alone they had not go
Size: 1600px × 1561px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, bookdecade1880, bookpu, booksubjectophthalmology
