. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . ie C urt: Tl-).e law has changtd and the evidence may also cliangeI Bv^^^ioBe is riit! of r. Chapriian. Mr. Chap an: I iink t!ie objection is prjmature. I am not. asking him in V^ir qi/estion w at ha said t: en, but I call hisattention to ihe fact t at he apoke ab/ut, a bluff, and I siuplyask him if ho can tell us where that is on exhibit 1, if itis on exhibit 1, and a at it v^ae to which he referred;


. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . ie C urt: Tl-).e law has changtd and the evidence may also cliangeI Bv^^^ioBe is riit! of r. Chapriian. Mr. Chap an: I iink t!ie objection is prjmature. I am not. asking him in V^ir qi/estion w at ha said t: en, but I call hisattention to ihe fact t at he apoke ab/ut, a bluff, and I siuplyask him if ho can tell us where that is on exhibit 1, if itis on exhibit 1, and a at it v^ae to which he referred; -ond t; enI propose to ask hiia some uestions about his former Ttie Court: Tlie quotjtion is v/iether the c n identifythe loc lity to which ho vras teBtifv^lng in the McRwrson Cuse, Mr. ChapfQan: Ygf, The queetion I sk asking hira ^ov is not foriB5)each:ient • Mr. Britt: Excfc\tion. A, I recof^ise the testiiiicny. Tilt- Cuiot: Q, Do r^co^ize the bluff? Waont it idcnti-ce:i with nhe rod hill? A. I t,hink bo, as I said here. But I would like to read myteotiLiony before so ans ering. Mr. Clmpman: I -fill re^id a little A. I would rather ja\x wuuld r«ad & little b ck. Tliat v/culdgi^ mo uovi confidence in the reply. Q. I dont want to read your testimony through, butI will read a lit Me further b ck.


Size: 1288px × 1941px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca