American gynaecological and obstetrical journal. . a m. cm. to International Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 449 of this diameter of mm., on the average, 4 mm. in maximum, 2mm. in minimum. My results are thus in contradiction with those ofKlein. Variations of the form of the pelvic cavity. After my five cadavermensurations I have constructed a design of the schematical form of thepelvic cavity, in saggital sections, in the lithotomy position and in thatof Walcher. This design is given in Fig. I. Fig. 2 represents the schematic design of the form of the brim inthe two po
American gynaecological and obstetrical journal. . a m. cm. to International Congress of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 449 of this diameter of mm., on the average, 4 mm. in maximum, 2mm. in minimum. My results are thus in contradiction with those ofKlein. Variations of the form of the pelvic cavity. After my five cadavermensurations I have constructed a design of the schematical form of thepelvic cavity, in saggital sections, in the lithotomy position and in thatof Walcher. This design is given in Fig. I. Fig. 2 represents the schematic design of the form of the brim inthe two positions. I shall not speak of the practical consequence of these considerationsbecause they are clear enough and having, moreover, mentioned themin my paper read at the 5th congress of the Italian Obstetrical andGynaecological Society. THE INFLUENCE OF THE POSITION OF THE WOMAN ( >NFORM AND DIMENSIONS OF THE PELVIS. Extract from the Report of Dr. G. Walcher, Stuttgart. Walcher memorizes-the ancient doctrine, taught by AmbroisePare and Severinus Pinosus. i. c., the
Size: 2204px × 1133px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1800, booksubjectgynecology, booksubjectobstetrics
