. Message from the President of the United States transmitting a letter of the Secretary of State, with the correspondence relative to the proposed fisheries treaty [microform]. Fishery law and legislation; Fishery law and legislation; Fisheries; Territorial waters; Seizure of vessels and cargoes; Pêche commerciale; Pêche commerciale; Pêche commerciale; Eaux territoriales; Prises maritimes. 14G ALLEGED OUTRAGE UPON AMEUICAN lu the opinion of this Government, it ia essontial tliat we slioulil at onco invito tin iiltintion tioiiH of this Government nnrturtlie treaty, makes it ntic


. Message from the President of the United States transmitting a letter of the Secretary of State, with the correspondence relative to the proposed fisheries treaty [microform]. Fishery law and legislation; Fishery law and legislation; Fisheries; Territorial waters; Seizure of vessels and cargoes; Pêche commerciale; Pêche commerciale; Pêche commerciale; Eaux territoriales; Prises maritimes. 14G ALLEGED OUTRAGE UPON AMEUICAN lu the opinion of this Government, it ia essontial tliat we slioulil at onco invito tin iiltintion tioiiH of this Government nnrturtlie treaty, makes it nticessary that the President should ask from Iler Majesty's Gov. ernment a frank avowal yment by our i>eoi)lo of the inshore fishery, which seems to be intinuited, if not asserted, in Lord Salisbury's not»\ Before the receipt of a reply from Her Majesty's (Jovei nment, it would be i)reniature to consider what should be tlie course of this Ciovcrninent should this limitation iipun the treaty jtri vilejjes of the United States bo insisted upon by the British Govcrumciii as their construction of the treaty. ill answer to thin u'nequivocjiil preseiitatioii, both of tbe freetloiii ot'tlie tisliery as this Govcnuiient iiiteipretoti the coticessioii of the treaty, and ot the absohire suppression of this treaty ri^ht, as a matter of practical value to oiir lishennen by this actual provincial lef-islation, Lonl Sails bury replied with less distiiKitness, no doubt, but yet in a sense wliiclil could not but regard as disdainnng any rif;ht to qualify the treaty by municipal lefiislatioii previous or siibsetiuent to its date. Afteriiitl I uniting a dissent from the doctrine, if I had intend«!d to assert it, "that no IJritisli authority has any right to pass any Mud of law biiuliug Ameiicans who are tishing in IJritish waters," Lord Salisbury says: On the oth;'r hand, Ih^r Majesty's (Joverntnent will rerdily admit what is, iiuU'id, (â elf-t!videiit, that British sovere


Size: 1017px × 2456px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1800, booksubjectfisheries, booksubjectfisherylawandl