. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . \enhad he n riiv rted to the Riverside colony. And above, it«as div-rteri tc te ?5oT-th fori: and thoSouth ?crk, Q And wa^ it dry balow River aide for any a-nfii(>.rfjbladistance? --, It is dry below irst intake but net fora long diet nee, becftuce it be/^ina to riae within a quarter of e ciile afterthfnio oroin« wrat. i2 3 4 56 have you obsorvod a» to their diaapjje&riri^ t^jBivn? A. Wiftxx the w&tor risww s
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187 . \enhad he n riiv rted to the Riverside colony. And above, it«as div-rteri tc te ?5oT-th fori: and thoSouth ?crk, Q And wa^ it dry balow River aide for any a-nfii(>.rfjbladistance? --, It is dry below irst intake but net fora long diet nee, becftuce it be/^ina to riae within a quarter of e ciile afterthfnio oroin« wrat. i2 3 4 56 have you obsorvod a» to their diaapjje&riri^ t^jBivn? A. Wiftxx the w&tor risww sOi-ioti^R il diaappeera a^in tsrii;sofsetiriea it XMnn a a toady flov on tJ;e aurfac©, Q. And BOt:K:itij conie do*r. sotib placef-TlliO^ do^wi ti© alreaiS arid up in tiie channel, Q Po« i£ it witb tM ?/at©re af t,er u^^y diaappear? • T y diaa^.-ouj HfSi^n itnd roap-peej* luyEiin in Mill Cru^ aa^i other iK-^tT i^u/5-jfitaAna iind. nenr HinrAa* 1. Do , uu &IIVV it is l-a l-u:;^ <.&twr? A, *^U, i ava iulXu*«iKi the afeb the ray throu^ ontJie •urfaf^^ am the reia^^ij^ttr
Size: 1287px × 1942px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto03cuca
