The anatomical record . ngement, but there are no sheets of bone, andthe bars are very delicate, with relatively much larger spaceslutween. A similar difTerence is present in the ilistal extremitiesof the lunneri, where the epiphyseal lines have the middle third of lh(> shaft there arc more trabeculae in theused than in the unused liumerus. The study of the split bones corroborates that of the X-rayl)lates as regards the union of epiphyses with diaphyses—theepiphyseal line has disajipeared in the distal ends of both humeriand in the |)roximal ends of the ulnae. The other e])i

---

The anatomical record . ngement, but there are no sheets of bone, andthe bars are very delicate, with relatively much larger spaceslutween. A similar difTerence is present in the ilistal extremitiesof the lunneri, where the epiphyseal lines have the middle third of lh(> shaft there arc more trabeculae in theused than in the unused liumerus. The study of the split bones corroborates that of the X-rayl)lates as regards the union of epiphyses with diaphyses—theepiphyseal line has disajipeared in the distal ends of both humeriand in the |)roximal ends of the ulnae. The other e])iphysealcartilages are still present in both bones, and are thicker onthe nnoperated side. The joint cartilages are also thicker onthis side. The gross differences in the bones of the two .sides are shown inthe comparative weigJits of the fresh bones, which are given intable 4: Ifumcrus. rinn CONTKDL OK HONK CKOWTII ?N DOfJSTABLK 4 247 WEIaDT<l IM IJIIAIM Lnoperatcd 10 G557 Operated 602 2

---

Size: 896px × 2788px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No

Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, booksubjectanatomy, bookyear1906