. Bulletin. Science. PATTERNS OF LOBSTER TRAP FISHING 31 Table 2. Summary statistics for the days that traps were surveyed. Traps Box-1 Traps Box ' Index of Date Total Traps Mean S. Error Dispersion 5 Oct, 2005 3333 26 Oct, 2005 1837 11 Jan, 2006 553 15 Mar, 2006 258 a clumped distribution. Trap distributions for each day of the survey is shown in Fig. 3. Note that there were more traps in northern La Jolla, and that the most heavily fished boxes were in shallow habitat adjacent to the reserve. The most obvious pattern in the data was th
. Bulletin. Science. PATTERNS OF LOBSTER TRAP FISHING 31 Table 2. Summary statistics for the days that traps were surveyed. Traps Box-1 Traps Box ' Index of Date Total Traps Mean S. Error Dispersion 5 Oct, 2005 3333 26 Oct, 2005 1837 11 Jan, 2006 553 15 Mar, 2006 258 a clumped distribution. Trap distributions for each day of the survey is shown in Fig. 3. Note that there were more traps in northern La Jolla, and that the most heavily fished boxes were in shallow habitat adjacent to the reserve. The most obvious pattern in the data was the distribution of lobster traps with depth. The correlation of traps (see Table 1) with depth was significant for Tl (p=0, R2 = ), T2 (p=0, R2 = ), and T4 (p=0, R2 = ), but not for T3 (p = ). The distribution of fishing effort was significantly correlated among days (Table 3). Fishing patterns were the most similar on the first two 05-Oct-2005 26-Oct-2005 Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original Southern California Academy of Sciences. Los Angeles, Calif. : The Academy
Size: 1386px × 1804px
Photo credit: © Library Book Collection / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookcollectionbiodiversity, booksubjectscience
