Interstate medical journal . Fit;- 19.—Biliary calculus. Fig. 20.—Biliary calculus. Same case as Fig. Fig. 21.—Biliary calculi. Compare re- Fig. 22.—Same case as Figs. 19 and of calculi to ribs in Fig. 11. Lateral view. Calculus in plane an- 3. If two plates are made with a lateral shift of the tube betweenthe two, even though they are not viewed stereoscopically, manytimes there will appear an altered relation between the stone andthe kidney or gall-bladder outline which will readily make thedifferentiation possible (Fig. 11, 21.) 4. If direct lateral plates are made with the p
Interstate medical journal . Fit;- 19.—Biliary calculus. Fig. 20.—Biliary calculus. Same case as Fig. Fig. 21.—Biliary calculi. Compare re- Fig. 22.—Same case as Figs. 19 and of calculi to ribs in Fig. 11. Lateral view. Calculus in plane an- 3. If two plates are made with a lateral shift of the tube betweenthe two, even though they are not viewed stereoscopically, manytimes there will appear an altered relation between the stone andthe kidney or gall-bladder outline which will readily make thedifferentiation possible (Fig. 11, 21.) 4. If direct lateral plates are made with the patient lying withthe right side on the plate, gall-stones will be shown in an anterior Cole: Right Renal Lithiasis and Gail-Stone 953 plane (Fig. 22), and renal calculi will lie in a posterior plane,possibly obscured by the lateral view of the spine. 5. If any of the standard methods for the localization of foreignbodies are employed, the proximity of the stone to the anterior orposterior wall can be shown. A very simple method of foreignbody localization which I published in 1902 is ideally adapt
Size: 2247px × 1112px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1910, bookidinter, booksubjectmedicine
