. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187. lli;and the deoline of the water in the liauie had ante-dated tiiat Tioint; now if that were attributable to the be-ginning of numpini-; on <ay 19, the point of be^inniu^ of thedecline would have to be after the be^jinninj of pumping; andnot before; and if all the measureujentB which K:r Heed made-there is one of heeds uieasurements - were shown, itwould still accentuate ttiis. iind at the stopping of t
. In Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California. Department One. Cucamonga Vineyard Co. et al., plaintiff vs. San Antonio Water Co., defendant; no. 9187. lli;and the deoline of the water in the liauie had ante-dated tiiat Tioint; now if that were attributable to the be-ginning of numpini-; on <ay 19, the point of be^inniu^ of thedecline would have to be after the be^jinninj of pumping; andnot before; and if all the measureujentB which K:r Heed made-there is one of heeds uieasurements - were shown, itwould still accentuate ttiis. iind at the stopping of thepumpin^j in January, 1906, thp rise of the water had alreadycommenced before the pump stonped; that is further snown oyexhibit 5 - - ^ uont io outside of this exhibit, A well, on this exhibit it shows the same tiling: that therise of the wat^r also anticipated the stopping of thepump; if it were the effect it woulu n;.ve folio ved it insteadof preceding/ it. Q nave you exrjnined Pl?^ intiffs yhioit number 38? A I have. Q </hat is your opinion as to that? A The exhibit purports to show tne punipin^ operations ofthe San Antonio iater Conipany, anu the ris« and fall of. water in arteaian iveil number 2, aiui hell:ajn well numDor E;now if i aiii not peraiitteu to point out v/iiere there Lre cis-crepanciee 1 will have lo coiifine i;.yBe]f to iha exhibit, i4 Yes, coruine youreclf to the exhibit, ii ijut even taking, the exhibit itsolf, anci reforrin<^, to theplace, San Aiitonio ;Vater Gompaiiy puni 4- hankell well number 2,the rise of iielluian well nuiiber 2 has prececiea that fact,onii when tais haskoll well nuiaber 2 was Tiwnpeci , after tnatheliman v^ell nuiuber Z still continuou U lise; if the pu-ip-in(- of the askell well were the cause ana the helluan veilfalling: were the effect of that, the roverse \fould have tooccura at tiiia tiuoe. iuna %nvn ve couc to the i;cxt aunuuer,nhen San iintonio .<ater Company cofiiiiienced pumping wells b,and 80 forth, at r-mrkod, ab
Size: 1307px × 1911px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bo, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidinsuperiorcourto07cuca
