. The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy and nuclear medicine . t, in thegrowth of small size, confirmation may bedesirable. Such mass is represented by anabsence of the mucosal folds in the affectedzone, and the encircling of the tumor bythe mixture so that it is directly the presence of an accompanyuigatrophic gastritis, the rugae are obliterated. 3. Differentiation of Extra GastricPressure Deject from Intrinsic Lesions. Not infrequently a regular deformity ofone or the other curvatures of the stomachconfronts the roentgenologist, and demandsa differentiation of pr
. The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy and nuclear medicine . t, in thegrowth of small size, confirmation may bedesirable. Such mass is represented by anabsence of the mucosal folds in the affectedzone, and the encircling of the tumor bythe mixture so that it is directly the presence of an accompanyuigatrophic gastritis, the rugae are obliterated. 3. Differentiation of Extra GastricPressure Deject from Intrinsic Lesions. Not infrequently a regular deformity ofone or the other curvatures of the stomachconfronts the roentgenologist, and demandsa differentiation of pressure defect from anuitrmsiL lesion. Ordinarily this is easilyand satisfactorily accomplished; but in anexceptional instance, the tinduigs may notbe conclusive. From the foregoing description of thenormal and pathological mucosa as demon-strated radiographically, one immediatelysees the marked contrast between the twocases. In the case of deformed contourresulting from an extragastric pressure an infiltrated mucosa as described aboveare seen in the case of intrinsic lesion. Fig. II. Ulcer, posterior wall of stomach with lessmarked contracture. Mixture has passed intojejunum.
Size: 1408px × 1774px
Photo credit: © Reading Room 2020 / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookauthoramerican, bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookyear1906
