..The fishes of Illinois . ows a marked preference for swift water and for a clean bottom,our coefficients for these situations being and is generally distributed from Lake Champlain and the St. Law-rence River through the lakes of central New York and the GreatLake basin to Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Virginia, northern Ala-bama, and Arkansas. Two thirds of the entire food of 33 specimens examined, con-sisted of insects, nearly half of which were terrestrial. Three ofour specimens had eaten small fishes, and a mixture of vegetableelements derived from both aquatic and ter
..The fishes of Illinois . ows a marked preference for swift water and for a clean bottom,our coefficients for these situations being and is generally distributed from Lake Champlain and the St. Law-rence River through the lakes of central New York and the GreatLake basin to Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Virginia, northern Ala-bama, and Arkansas. Two thirds of the entire food of 33 specimens examined, con-sisted of insects, nearly half of which were terrestrial. Three ofour specimens had eaten small fishes, and a mixture of vegetableelements derived from both aquatic and terrestrial plants had beeneaten mainly by four, one of which had fed only on algae, whilethree others had taken some 90 per cent, of their food from miscel- *Cases of apparent TV. whipplii in which the teeth are 4-4 or 1, 4-4, 1 occur;n a few collections from localities in which TV. lutrensis and TV. whipplii seem tointergrade. In general our collections show, however, that little variation needbe looked for in this •j$$wm$ | COMMON SHINER, Notropis cornutus (Mitchill)
Size: 2237px × 1117px
Photo credit: © The Reading Room / Alamy / Afripics
License: Licensed
Model Released: No
Keywords: ., bookcentury1900, bookdecade1900, bookidcu31924, booksubjectfishes
